Category Archives: Debt and Taxes

Facts Correcting Liberals’ Misconceptions

by Jim Edsall

MISCONCEPTION 1: Tax revenues are down because the rich don’t pay enough.

FACT: Tax revenues are down because 46% of Americans pay NO federal income tax

The biggest reason that government revenues are relatively low compared to GDP recently is NOT that the tax rate on the rich is “only” 35%. It is because Bush got so progressive with his tax cuts that 46% of Americans now pay NO federal income taxes:

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/26/pf/taxes/income-tax/index.htm

Yes, all who are employed pay payroll taxes (“FICA” toward Medicare and Social Security), but nearly half of all Americans pay NO federal income tax.

MISCONCEPTION 2: Ending the Bush tax rates for the top bracket would only increase taxes on “the 1%”, and that is the answer to our national debt and budget shortfalls.

FACT: Ending the Bush tax rates for the top bracket would hurt  people who are not in the 1%, and would not produce enough revenue.

“The 1%” are folks who make over $750,000 per year.

http://blogs.barrons.com/penta/2012/05/07/who-are-the-one-percent/

Democrats are trying to end the Bush tax rates for people making only $200,000 per year ($250,000 for a couple). Even Chuck Shumer said that would badly hurt small business owners, farmers with mid-and-large size farms, and even average people working in New York because income levels there are commensurate with costs of living. Shumer pushed for the Buffet Rule, raising the rate only on those making $1 million per year.That would not generate enough money to cure the nation’s ills. The federal government spends $10 billion per day:

http://moneyland.time.com/2011/07/29/brother-can-you-spare-a-billion-apple-has-more-cash-than-uncle-sam/

Raising taxes on “the 1%” an additional 4.6% only adds $4.7 billion PER YEAR:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57411710/white-house-buffett-rule-a-look-at-the-numbers/

The math does not work. Not remotely close. What we really need is to grow the economy and increase GDP.

Even Obama said that “the last thing we should do is raise taxes in a recession.”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/07/10/obama_flashback_last_

thing_you_want_in_recession_is_to_raise_taxes

The economy is NOT a zero-sum game. We should not think in terms of taking part of one person’s piece of the pie so someone else’s piece can be bigger. We should, and can, work to make the WHOLE PIE BIGGER.

MISCONCEPTION 3: The biggest reason for the current economic crisis is deregulation of the financial industry by Republicans.

FACT: The greatest blame goes to  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and to Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, who blocked their regulation. 

The biggest reason for the current economic crisis is NOT de-regulation by Republicans. It was Democrats blocking regulation of Fannie Mae. I am about to start writing a book about this. I saw it from inside the real estate industry, which was closely tied to the mortgage industry. Fannie Mae was run by Clinton’s Director of OMB, Franklin Raines. They backed sub-prime loans and packaged them into mortgage-backed securities. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd blocked efforts to reign in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac throughout Bush’s presidency. See this article from Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0

It was beyond galling that the financial regulation bill was named for them!

MISCONCEPTION 4: Republicans and the Tea Party are advancing atheism by promoting Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged.

FACT: Republicans and Tea Partiers agree with Ayn Rand’s View of Capitalism but few if any agree with her atheism.

Most Republicans agree with Ayn Rand’s view of capitalism, and find her tale of how socialist policies hurt individuals and society by policies that discourage and hinder business to be credible. However, most do not agree with the atheism Randian Objectivism. Nearly all Republicans are center-right, or conservatives, not libertarians. Libertarians are to the far right, so much so that they are in danger of circling all the way around to the LEFT, as most are pro-abortion, and pro-gay marriage (not conservative Republican positions, as you well know). The Tea Party is not part of the Republican party. It did not arise from it, and deliberately declares itself independent of any party. It is actually a loose group of groups, whose idea is simply to keep government limited. Here is an interesting NY Times article that I agree with: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/15/opinion/ayn-rand-wouldnt-approve-of-paul-ryan.html

Few Libertarians, and even fewer Republicans, agree with Ayn Rand’s atheism. Paul Ryan, and all conservative Christians, should make that clearly known.

MISCONCEPTION 5: President Obama is not a Socialist

FACT: Okay, he’s just a Leftist with a Socialist Worldview

President Obama may not be a socialist in the pure sense of the term, that is, he has not avocated government ownership of all of American business, just 26% of General Motors. He just seems to be a leftist with a socialist worldview. His mentor, Frank Marshall Davis was a Communist. He was closer to radical ex-terrorist Bill Ayers than he admitted — Ayers hosted Obama’s first political fund raiser at his house; Obama claimed he was “just a guy in the neighborhood.” Why did he lie about it? His pastor in Chicago, Jeremiah Wright, is a proponent of Black Liberation Theology. Obama’s cabinet and czar appointments include numerous people who promote socialist policies (Van Jones, David Berwick, Cass Sunstein): http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2011/czar-report-09152011.pdf

While an Illinois senator, Obama was a panelist at a celebration of Chicago radical Saul Alinsky: http://www.chicagoreader.com/gyrobase/the-connection-between-obama-and-saul-alinsky/Content?oid=5593347&storyPage=2,

… who dedicated his book “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer!

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100808074147AAWUfU1

No cause for concern in any of this?

MISCONCEPTION 6: The Government needs to start helping the poor

FACT: The Government ALREADY helps to poor

Government ALREADY provides for the destitute and the poor: Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, SSI, CHIP, WIC, food stamps, welfare, unemployment insurance.Republicans pay their taxes toward all of this, too. It already takes the average American 107 work days to pay just their federal, state and local taxes:

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/02/pf/taxes/tax-freedom-day/index.htm

And then everything you buy with what you have left is taxed — sales tax, gas tax, phone tax, ad infinitum.

Add to that OBAMACARE, which includes numerous new taxes BESIDES the individual mandate:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/02/no-obamacare-isnt-the-largest-tax-increase-in-the-history-of-the-world-in-one-chart/

Democrats are for ever-larger, more expensive, more intrusive government, at the expense of their own FREEDOM, and everyone else’s, including mine. I PROTEST! Republicans are in favor of working through existing programs like Medicaid, PLUS providing premium support (direct monetary payments) to help cover health insurance costs like they do in GERMANY, while lowering malpractice insurance costs, and allowing insurance companies to compete across state lines to keep costs down. We will allow children up to age 26 to stay on their parents’ policy, and cover pre-existing conditions when we repeal and REPLACE ObamaCare. All of this would help the poor without it being at the cost of their freedom. How can liberals stand being subject to the dictates of the Secretary of HHS? They may think it is just fine now. Will they still think so when the determination of whether they qualify for a procedure is one day determined by a bureaucrat in a Republican administration? My guess is no.

Back to Reagan

June 18, 2012 by Jim Edsall

In his 54-minute speech on the economy in Ohio on June 14, 2012, President Obama claimed that electing Mitt Romney would mean a return to “the policies of the last decade”, that is, to the economic policies of George W. Bush. Romney’s policies are indeed like those of a former president, but that president is not George W. Bush. It is Ronald Reagan.

Yesterday on Fox News Sunday, former Clinton advisor Joe Trippi lauded Obama’s speech as right on target for 2012. Why? Because the President is desperate to make this election a contrast between himself and Romney, rather than a referendum on his own performance. The tactic of trying to tie Romney to Bush is a clever one, as recent polls show that 65% of the American people believe that the economic downturn is still either largely or at least partly due to Bush. Trippi believes that speech effectively reset the debate.

Romney has thus far successfully kept the focus on President Obama and his failure to turn the economy around, particularly the unemployment rate Continue reading

It’s All About Color, but it’s Not About Race

by Jim Edsall

According to recent polls, half of the American people believe that Barack Obama should not be given a second term as President, and it’s all about color but it’s not about race. In his 2008 campaign, Obama positioned himself as uniquely able to unite all Americans by respecting divergent viewpoints and working to achieve consensus. That message had particular appeal in swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida, which are not all Republican “red” or all Democrat “blue”. Many who voted for Obama were hoping for unifying, moderate, bi-partisan, purple governance. What they got was something else entirely.

Stimulus

With a Democratic majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, and a filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate, the President Continue reading